For the second time, Parliament has started an investigation into President Meta. This time around, the Inquiry Commission for the President’s impeachment is headed by Alket Hyseni and the result of today’s first meeting was the approval of the commission’s plan of action.
“Beyond our own political beliefs, our only mission stands before the Constitution and the Law. We have said it before that the establishment of this Commission isn’t the most pleasant thing in the world. I believe that events like these aren’t particularly enjoyable for parliamentary life,” stated Hyseni.
It wasn’t just the president’s calls during the electoral campaign that the ruling party claims incited violence, but also his moves and meetings that are now required to undergo a thorough investigation.
“We should officially ask law-enforcement agencies to provide us with information; the National Informative Services, the General Judiciary of the State Police and the Directory of Anti-terror in order to notify us about the confidential information that these law enforcement agencies have possessed during the entire 30 days of the campaign. Based on the confidential information I have, there are possible meetings with exponents of the crime world, meetings with individuals that could have incited violence, but nonetheless none of us is competent about any of this, as we need to have at our disposal, all the above-mentioned documents from the all law enforcement agencies of this country,” said Myslim Murrizi.
In order to not compromise the investigations and incite further conflict with the Head of State, Spartak Braho, former MP of the party founded by Ilir Meta before becoming president, asked his colleagues to spare their public accusations.
“We are a quasi-court or a quasi-prosecution; we are entrusted with investigating into this case, on the basis of which we will draw our conclusions, regarding whether or not there were serious violations by the President of the Republic, but until then, we shouldn’t give any definitive declarations about the President before the fact,” said Braho.
The previous judgments of the Venice Commission and the Constitutional Court regarding President Meta, will be part of the case file and work plan of this Inquiry Commission. The Presidency, on the other hand, has made it very clear that it won’t concede any of the “unlawful and anti-constitutional verdicts or activities of a one-party system and unilateral Parliament”.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE:
